1963 Ford Zodiac vs. 1997 Mahindra Armada
To start off, 1997 Mahindra Armada is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Ford Zodiac (108 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1997 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Ford Zodiac should accelerate faster than 1997 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 730 kg more than 1963 Ford Zodiac.
Because 1997 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Ford Zodiac. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Zodiac | 1997 Mahindra Armada | |
Make | Ford | Mahindra |
Model | Zodiac | Armada |
Year Released | 1963 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2553 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4310 mm |