1963 Ford Zodiac vs. 2002 Peugeot H2O
To start off, 2002 Peugeot H2O is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Zodiac would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Peugeot H2O weights approximately 430 kg more than 1963 Ford Zodiac.
Because 1963 Ford Zodiac is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Zodiac. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Peugeot H2O, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Ford Zodiac | 2002 Peugeot H2O | |
| Make | Ford | Peugeot |
| Model | Zodiac | H2O |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1690 mm |
