1963 Ford Zodiac vs. 2005 Kia Cerato
To start off, 2005 Kia Cerato is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Ford Zodiac (108 HP) has 7 more horse power than 2005 Kia Cerato. (101 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Ford Zodiac should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia Cerato. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Ford Zodiac weights approximately 75 kg more than 2005 Kia Cerato. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Ford Zodiac is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Zodiac. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Kia Cerato, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Ford Zodiac (191 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia Cerato. (144 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1963 Ford Zodiac will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia Cerato. 2005 Kia Cerato has automatic transmission and 1963 Ford Zodiac has manual transmission. 1963 Ford Zodiac will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Kia Cerato will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Ford Zodiac | 2005 Kia Cerato | |
| Make | Ford | Kia |
| Model | Zodiac | Cerato |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2553 cc | 1599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 101 HP |
| Torque | 191 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2620 mm |
