1963 Ford Zodiac vs. 2005 Toyota Sienna
To start off, 2005 Toyota Sienna is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 3,298 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Sienna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Sienna (230 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1963 Ford Zodiac. (108 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Sienna should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Zodiac. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Sienna weights approximately 599 kg more than 1963 Ford Zodiac. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Ford Zodiac is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Zodiac. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Sienna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Sienna (344 Nm) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Zodiac. (191 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota Sienna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Zodiac. 2005 Toyota Sienna has automatic transmission and 1963 Ford Zodiac has manual transmission. 1963 Ford Zodiac will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Toyota Sienna will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Zodiac | 2005 Toyota Sienna | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Zodiac | Sienna |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2553 cc | 3298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 191 Nm | 344 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 83 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1869 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1970 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 3040 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 76 L |