1963 Ford Zodiac vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 376 kg more than 1963 Ford Zodiac.
Because 2008 Toyota Condor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Ford Zodiac. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Condor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota Condor (195 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Zodiac. (191 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2008 Toyota Condor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Zodiac.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Zodiac | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Zodiac | Condor |
Year Released | 1963 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2553 cc | 2436 cc |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 191 Nm | 195 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 86 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1646 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 5020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 70 L |