1963 Ford Zodiac vs. 2009 Renault Koleos
To start off, 2009 Renault Koleos is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Koleos (169 HP) has 61 more horse power than 1963 Ford Zodiac. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Koleos should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Zodiac. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Renault Koleos weights approximately 380 kg more than 1963 Ford Zodiac. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Renault Koleos is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Ford Zodiac. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Koleos will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Ford Zodiac | 2009 Renault Koleos | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Zodiac | Koleos |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2553 cc | 2488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 169 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 161 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1855 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1695 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2690 mm |
