1963 Ford Zodiac vs. 2010 Audi A6
To start off, 2010 Audi A6 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,671 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi A6 (178 HP) has 70 more horse power than 1963 Ford Zodiac. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Zodiac.
Because 2010 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Ford Zodiac. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Zodiac | 2010 Audi A6 | |
Make | Ford | Audi |
Model | Zodiac | A6 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2553 cc | 2671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 178 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4934 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1862 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1519 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2833 mm |