1963 Holden EJ vs. 1947 Maserati A6G
To start off, 1963 Holden EJ is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 64 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Holden EJ weights approximately 259 kg more than 1947 Maserati A6G.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Holden EJ | 1947 Maserati A6G | |
| Make | Holden | Maserati |
| Model | EJ | A6G |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1947 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1486 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 875 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2560 mm |
