1963 Holden EJ vs. 1949 Simca 8
To start off, 1963 Holden EJ is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Simca 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Simca 8 would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Holden EJ (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1949 Simca 8. (49 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Holden EJ should accelerate faster than 1949 Simca 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Holden EJ weights approximately 184 kg more than 1949 Simca 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Holden EJ (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Simca 8. (88 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1963 Holden EJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Simca 8.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Holden EJ | 1949 Simca 8 | |
Make | Holden | Simca |
Model | EJ | 8 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1949 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1220 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 88 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2450 mm |