1963 Holden EJ vs. 1958 Lotus Elite
To start off, 1963 Holden EJ is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Lotus Elite (71 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Lotus Elite should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Holden EJ weights approximately 554 kg more than 1958 Lotus Elite.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Holden EJ (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Lotus Elite. (105 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1963 Holden EJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Lotus Elite.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Holden EJ | 1958 Lotus Elite | |
Make | Holden | Lotus |
Model | EJ | Elite |
Year Released | 1963 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1216 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2240 mm |