1963 Holden EJ vs. 1964 Singer Vogue III
To start off, 1964 Singer Vogue III is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Singer Vogue III (79 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Singer Vogue III should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Holden EJ weights approximately 42 kg more than 1964 Singer Vogue III.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Holden EJ | 1964 Singer Vogue III | |
Make | Holden | Singer |
Model | EJ | Vogue III |
Year Released | 1963 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1592 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1092 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2570 mm |