1963 Holden EJ vs. 1965 MG MGC
To start off, 1965 MG MGC is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 MG MGC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 MG MGC (148 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 MG MGC should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 MG MGC (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 1965 MG MGC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Holden EJ | 1965 MG MGC | |
| Make | Holden | MG |
| Model | EJ | MGC |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2262 cc | 2912 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 174 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2560 mm |
