1963 Holden EJ vs. 1966 Marcos 1800
To start off, 1966 Marcos 1800 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Marcos 1800 (114 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Marcos 1800 should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Holden EJ weights approximately 364 kg more than 1966 Marcos 1800.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Holden EJ (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Marcos 1800. (149 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1963 Holden EJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Marcos 1800.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Holden EJ | 1966 Marcos 1800 | |
Make | Holden | Marcos |
Model | EJ | 1800 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1783 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 149 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2280 mm |