1963 Holden EJ vs. 1966 Opel Rekord
To start off, 1966 Opel Rekord is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Opel Rekord (88 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Opel Rekord should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Holden EJ weights approximately 4 kg more than 1966 Opel Rekord.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Holden EJ (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Opel Rekord. (146 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1963 Holden EJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Opel Rekord.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Holden EJ | 1966 Opel Rekord | |
Make | Holden | Opel |
Model | EJ | Rekord |
Year Released | 1963 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1895 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 88 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 146 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1130 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2670 mm |