1963 Holden EJ vs. 1969 Jaguar E-Type
To start off, 1969 Jaguar E-Type is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Jaguar E-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Jaguar E-Type (225 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Jaguar E-Type should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Jaguar E-Type weights approximately 266 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Holden EJ | 1969 Jaguar E-Type | |
| Make | Holden | Jaguar |
| Model | EJ | E-Type |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2262 cc | 4235 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1190 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2450 mm |
