1963 Holden EJ vs. 1969 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1969 Nissan Cedric is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Nissan Cedric (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 156 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1969 Nissan Cedric (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 1969 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Holden EJ | 1969 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Holden | Nissan |
| Model | EJ | Cedric |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2700 mm |
