1963 Holden EJ vs. 1971 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1971 Lotus Elan is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Lotus Elan (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1971 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Holden EJ weights approximately 434 kg more than 1971 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Holden EJ | 1971 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Holden | Lotus |
Model | EJ | Elan |
Year Released | 1963 | 1971 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1170 mm |