1963 Holden EJ vs. 1971 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1971 Mazda RX-2 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1971 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1971 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Holden EJ weights approximately 174 kg more than 1971 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Holden EJ (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Mazda RX-2. (158 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1963 Holden EJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Holden EJ | 1971 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | EJ | RX-2 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1971 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2480 mm |