1963 Holden EJ vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 1974 Volvo 140 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Volvo 140 (81 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Volvo 140 should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Holden EJ (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Volvo 140. (157 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1963 Holden EJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Volvo 140.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Holden EJ | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
Make | Holden | Volvo |
Model | EJ | 140 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2620 mm |