1963 Holden EJ vs. 1976 Renault Rodeo
To start off, 1976 Renault Rodeo is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Holden EJ weights approximately 454 kg more than 1976 Renault Rodeo.
Because 1963 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Renault Rodeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Holden EJ | 1976 Renault Rodeo | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | EJ | Rodeo |
Year Released | 1963 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 845 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 680 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2410 mm |