1963 Holden EJ vs. 1978 Mazda 626
To start off, 1978 Mazda 626 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mazda 626 (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Holden EJ weights approximately 139 kg more than 1978 Mazda 626.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Holden EJ (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 626. (150 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1963 Holden EJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Holden EJ | 1978 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | EJ | 626 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1768 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2520 mm |