1963 Holden EJ vs. 1980 Zastava 1300

To start off, 1980 Zastava 1300 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Holden EJ (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1980 Zastava 1300. (59 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Holden EJ should accelerate faster than 1980 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Holden EJ weights approximately 174 kg more than 1980 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Holden EJ (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 1963 Holden EJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Zastava 1300.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Holden EJ 1980 Zastava 1300
Make Holden Zastava
Model EJ 1300
Year Released 1963 1980
Engine Size 2262 cc 1295 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 64 HP 59 HP
Engine RPM 4200 RPM 5400 RPM
Torque 163 Nm 93 Nm
Torque RPM 1400 RPM 3100 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1134 kg 960 kg
Vehicle Length 4500 mm 4040 mm
Vehicle Width 1740 mm 1550 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2430 mm