1963 Holden EJ vs. 1982 GMC Jimmy
To start off, 1982 GMC Jimmy is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Holden EJ (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1982 GMC Jimmy. (62 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Holden EJ should accelerate faster than 1982 GMC Jimmy. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 GMC Jimmy weights approximately 366 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ.
Because 1982 GMC Jimmy is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Holden EJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 GMC Jimmy will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Holden EJ (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 GMC Jimmy. (130 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1963 Holden EJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 GMC Jimmy.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Holden EJ | 1982 GMC Jimmy | |
Make | Holden | GMC |
Model | EJ | Jimmy |
Year Released | 1963 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 2238 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 130 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2560 mm |