1963 Holden EJ vs. 1983 Renault Siete

To start off, 1983 Renault Siete is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Holden EJ (64 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1983 Renault Siete. (44 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Holden EJ should accelerate faster than 1983 Renault Siete. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Holden EJ weights approximately 319 kg more than 1983 Renault Siete. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Renault Siete, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Holden EJ (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Renault Siete. (84 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1963 Holden EJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Renault Siete.

Compare all specifications: