1963 Holden EJ vs. 1985 Volvo 780
To start off, 1985 Volvo 780 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,383 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Volvo 780 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Volvo 780 (127 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Volvo 780 should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Volvo 780 weights approximately 336 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Volvo 780 (250 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 1985 Volvo 780 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Holden EJ | 1985 Volvo 780 | |
Make | Holden | Volvo |
Model | EJ | 780 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 2383 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 127 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 250 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2780 mm |