1963 Holden EJ vs. 1986 Mazda 929
To start off, 1986 Mazda 929 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,953 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Mazda 929 (190 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Mazda 929 should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Mazda 929 weights approximately 491 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Mazda 929 (259 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 1986 Mazda 929 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Holden EJ | 1986 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | EJ | 929 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 259 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1625 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2720 mm |