1963 Holden EJ vs. 1987 Acura Integra
To start off, 1987 Acura Integra is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Acura Integra (125 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1987 Acura Integra should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ.
Because 1963 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Holden EJ (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Acura Integra. (139 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1963 Holden EJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Acura Integra.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Holden EJ | 1987 Acura Integra | |
Make | Holden | Acura |
Model | EJ | Integra |
Year Released | 1963 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 125 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 139 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4355 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1665 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2520 mm |