1963 Holden EJ vs. 1987 Volvo 760
To start off, 1987 Volvo 760 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,383 cc (6 cylinders), 1987 Volvo 760 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Volvo 760 (108 HP) has 44 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1987 Volvo 760 should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Volvo 760 weights approximately 256 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Volvo 760 (205 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 1987 Volvo 760 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Holden EJ | 1987 Volvo 760 | |
Make | Holden | Volvo |
Model | EJ | 760 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 2383 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 163 Nm | 205 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2780 mm |