1963 Holden EJ vs. 1988 Renault Megane
To start off, 1988 Renault Megane is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,999 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Renault Megane (250 HP) has 186 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ.
Because 1963 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Renault Megane (181 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm). This means 1988 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Holden EJ | 1988 Renault Megane | |
| Make | Holden | Renault |
| Model | EJ | Megane |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1988 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2262 cc | 2999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 250 HP |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 181 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
