1963 Holden EJ vs. 1989 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 1989 Toyota Lite Ace is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Holden EJ weights approximately 34 kg more than 1989 Toyota Lite Ace.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Holden EJ | 1989 Toyota Lite Ace | |
Make | Holden | Toyota |
Model | EJ | Lite Ace |
Year Released | 1963 | 1989 |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1910 mm |