1963 Holden EJ vs. 1992 Mazda 626

To start off, 1992 Mazda 626 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mazda 626 (106 HP) has 42 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mazda 626 weights approximately 11 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Holden EJ (163 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mazda 626. (157 Nm). This means 1963 Holden EJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mazda 626.

Compare all specifications: