1963 Holden EJ vs. 1994 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1994 Ford Mustang is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 4,940 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Ford Mustang (212 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Mustang weights approximately 336 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Holden EJ | 1994 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Holden | Ford |
| Model | EJ | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2262 cc | 4940 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 212 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2580 mm |
