1963 Holden EJ vs. 1994 Lancia Zeta
To start off, 1994 Lancia Zeta is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Lancia Zeta (89 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Lancia Zeta should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ.
Because 1963 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Lancia Zeta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Lancia Zeta (182 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 1994 Lancia Zeta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Holden EJ | 1994 Lancia Zeta | |
| Make | Holden | Lancia |
| Model | EJ | Zeta |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1929 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 182 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
