1963 Holden EJ vs. 1995 Toyota MRJ
To start off, 1995 Toyota MRJ is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Toyota MRJ (71 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Toyota MRJ should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Toyota MRJ weights approximately 438 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Toyota MRJ (285 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm). This means 1995 Toyota MRJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Holden EJ | 1995 Toyota MRJ | |
| Make | Holden | Toyota |
| Model | EJ | MRJ |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1762 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 285 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1572 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2630 mm |
