1963 Holden EJ vs. 1996 Renault 19
To start off, 1996 Renault 19 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault 19 (106 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault 19 should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault 19 weights approximately 11 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Holden EJ (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Renault 19. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1963 Holden EJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Renault 19.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Holden EJ | 1996 Renault 19 | |
| Make | Holden | Renault |
| Model | EJ | 19 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1794 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 2750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1145 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2550 mm |
