1963 Holden EJ vs. 1996 Volkswagen Jetta
To start off, 1996 Volkswagen Jetta is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Volkswagen Jetta (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Volkswagen Jetta should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ.
Because 1963 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Volkswagen Jetta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Volkswagen Jetta (165 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm). This means 1996 Volkswagen Jetta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Holden EJ | 1996 Volkswagen Jetta | |
| Make | Holden | Volkswagen |
| Model | EJ | Jetta |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1897 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2480 mm |
