1963 Holden EJ vs. 1997 Fiat Siena
To start off, 1997 Fiat Siena is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Holden EJ (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1997 Fiat Siena. (51 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Holden EJ should accelerate faster than 1997 Fiat Siena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Fiat Siena weights approximately 166 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ.
Because 1963 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Fiat Siena (200 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm). This means 1997 Fiat Siena will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Holden EJ | 1997 Fiat Siena | |
Make | Holden | Fiat |
Model | EJ | Siena |
Year Released | 1963 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1910 cc |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 200 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1300 kg |