1963 Holden EJ vs. 1997 Mazda SW-X
To start off, 1997 Mazda SW-X is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Holden EJ weights approximately 29 kg more than 1997 Mazda SW-X.
Because 1963 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mazda SW-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Holden EJ | 1997 Mazda SW-X | |
| Make | Holden | Mazda |
| Model | EJ | SW-X |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1105 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2620 mm |
