1963 Holden EJ vs. 2000 Isuzu Kai
To start off, 2000 Isuzu Kai is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Isuzu Kai is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Isuzu Kai is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Holden EJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Isuzu Kai will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Holden EJ | 2000 Isuzu Kai | |
| Make | Holden | Isuzu |
| Model | EJ | Kai |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2262 cc | 3001 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2700 mm |
