1963 Holden EJ vs. 2000 Lotus Extreme
To start off, 2000 Lotus Extreme is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus Extreme (120 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus Extreme should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Holden EJ weights approximately 678 kg more than 2000 Lotus Extreme.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotus Extreme (180 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm). This means 2000 Lotus Extreme will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Holden EJ | 2000 Lotus Extreme | |
Make | Holden | Lotus |
Model | EJ | Extreme |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 700 cc |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 180 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 456 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2420 mm |