1963 Holden EJ vs. 2000 Marcos Mantis
To start off, 2000 Marcos Mantis is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Marcos Mantis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Marcos Mantis (506 HP) has 442 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Marcos Mantis should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Marcos Mantis (613 Nm) has 450 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm). This means 2000 Marcos Mantis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Holden EJ | 2000 Marcos Mantis | |
| Make | Holden | Marcos |
| Model | EJ | Mantis |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2262 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 506 HP |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 613 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1020 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2290 mm |
