1963 Holden EJ vs. 2000 Renault P55
To start off, 2000 Renault P55 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Renault P55 (108 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Renault P55 should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Renault P55 weights approximately 636 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Renault P55, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Renault P55 (260 Nm) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm). This means 2000 Renault P55 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Holden EJ | 2000 Renault P55 | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | EJ | P55 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 260 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1770 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2480 mm |