1963 Holden EJ vs. 2000 Subaru Outback

To start off, 2000 Subaru Outback is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,999 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Subaru Outback (206 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Subaru Outback weights approximately 476 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Holden EJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Subaru Outback (282 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2000 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.

Compare all specifications: