1963 Holden EJ vs. 2001 Jaguar XJ8
To start off, 2001 Jaguar XJ8 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Jaguar XJ8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Jaguar XJ8 (201 HP) has 137 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Jaguar XJ8 should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Jaguar XJ8 weights approximately 576 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Jaguar XJ8 (380 Nm) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm). This means 2001 Jaguar XJ8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Holden EJ | 2001 Jaguar XJ8 | |
| Make | Holden | Jaguar |
| Model | EJ | XJ8 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2262 cc | 4200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 201 HP |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1710 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2880 mm |
