1963 Holden EJ vs. 2001 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2001 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Nissan X-Trail (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 270 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Holden EJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan X-Trail (245 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2001 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Holden EJ | 2001 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | EJ | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1963 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 2488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 245 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1404 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2660 mm |