1963 Holden EJ vs. 2002 Hyundai Getz
To start off, 2002 Hyundai Getz is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Hyundai Getz (135 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Hyundai Getz should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ.
Because 1963 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Hyundai Getz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Holden EJ | 2002 Hyundai Getz | |
Make | Holden | Hyundai |
Model | EJ | Getz |
Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 135 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2460 mm |