1963 Holden EJ vs. 2002 Mahindra Bolero
To start off, 2002 Mahindra Bolero is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,523 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mahindra Bolero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Holden EJ (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2002 Mahindra Bolero. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Holden EJ should accelerate faster than 2002 Mahindra Bolero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mahindra Bolero weights approximately 648 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ.
Because 2002 Mahindra Bolero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Holden EJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra Bolero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mahindra Bolero (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2002 Mahindra Bolero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Holden EJ | 2002 Mahindra Bolero | |
| Make | Holden | Mahindra |
| Model | EJ | Bolero |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 2262 cc | 2523 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1782 kg |
