1963 Holden EJ vs. 2003 Mercedes-Benz S

To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz S is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 5,513 cc (12 cylinders), 2003 Mercedes-Benz S is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mercedes-Benz S (493 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 429 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mercedes-Benz S should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mercedes-Benz S weights approximately 926 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mercedes-Benz S (800 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 637 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2003 Mercedes-Benz S will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Holden EJ 2003 Mercedes-Benz S
Make Holden Mercedes-Benz
Model EJ S
Year Released 1963 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2262 cc 5513 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 12 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 64 HP 493 HP
Engine RPM 4200 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 163 Nm 800 Nm
Torque RPM 1400 RPM 1800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1134 kg 2060 kg
Vehicle Length 4500 mm 5170 mm
Vehicle Width 1740 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 3090 mm