1963 Holden EJ vs. 2004 Mazda Tribute

To start off, 2004 Mazda Tribute is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (201 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 449 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Holden EJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda Tribute (271 Nm) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Holden EJ 2004 Mazda Tribute
Make Holden Mazda
Model EJ Tribute
Year Released 1963 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2262 cc 2966 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 64 HP 201 HP
Engine RPM 4200 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 163 Nm 271 Nm
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Vehicle Weight 1134 kg 1583 kg
Vehicle Length 4500 mm 4400 mm
Vehicle Width 1740 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1780 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2620 mm