1963 Holden EJ vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL

To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 5,439 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL (493 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 429 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL weights approximately 846 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL (700 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 537 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Holden EJ 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL
Make Holden Mercedes-Benz
Model EJ SL
Year Released 1963 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2262 cc 5439 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 64 HP 493 HP
Engine RPM 4200 RPM 6100 RPM
Torque 163 Nm 700 Nm
Torque RPM 1400 RPM 2750 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1134 kg 1980 kg
Vehicle Length 4500 mm 4540 mm
Vehicle Width 1740 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1300 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2570 mm